Friday, May 29, 2009

Home Price Stabilization Key to Recovery

May 29 (Bloomberg) -- Nicolas Retsinas, director of housing studies at Harvard University, talks with Bloomberg's Deirdre Bolton about the need for home prices to stabilize before the U.S. housing market can begin to recover.

Retsinas also discusses housing data released this week and the implications of rising foreclosures. (Source: Bloomberg)










Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Buying vs Renting a home


When it makes sense to rent :
(Money Magazine) -- In 2004, Tim Jones bought a little piece of the American dream: a modest three-bedroom home in Bend, Ore., that went for $218,000. Three years later he married and was ready for phase two of the dream: trading up. But instead of buying, he and wife Elise pocketed the $100,000 profit from the sale of their house and rented bigger digs.

Smart move. Today Jones, 36, estimates their old place would sell for only $230,000. Meanwhile, he and Elise, 37, have been paying $1,250 a month for their rental, the same as their total costs for the smaller house. "I'm not building equity, but nobody around here is," says Jones.

With home prices expected to continue falling in most areas this year and to flatline for several years after that, many people are joining the Joneses in rethinking the merits of home ownership - for now.

As a renter, you won't wind up throwing away money on eroding equity. And there's plenty of inventory to choose from, as owners who can't sell seek to rent their condos and single-family homes.

You'll pay less for the same space too. U.S. rents dipped in the fourth quarter of last year, according to the Census Bureau, and real estate research firm Property & Portfolio projects they will fall again in 2009.
Read entire article :

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Hamptons Home Sales Drop Most on Record, Prices Decline

Hamptons Home Sales Drop Most on Record, Prices Decline
May 22 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg's Su Keenan reports on the housing market in the Hamptons of Long Island, New York. Sales have declined the most in the 27 years that broker Town & Country Real Estate has kept records for the Long Island beach towns about 100 miles east of Manhattan. The first-quarter median price fell 23.5 percent from a year earlier to $675,000, according to Miller Samuel.







Housing Hitting Bottom Means Fewest Starts Since 1945

By Kathleen M. Howley

May 26 (Bloomberg) -- The slump in the U.S. housing market that caused the median value of homes to decline 24 percent since 2006 may bottom next month without any prospect of a rebound for another year, according to estimates from chief economists at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Mortgage Bankers Association and national realtors and homebuilder groups.

Existing home sales probably won’t reach pre-boom levels until the third quarter of 2010 and housing starts won’t surpass 1 million until 2011, a barrier last broken six decades ago, the economists said.

“There are very few V-shaped recoveries in the history of real estate, and this one is likely to be even slower because of the size of the bubble,” said Robert Shiller, the Yale University professor who, with economist Karl Case, created home price indexes in the 1980s now used by Standard & Poor’s.

The rebound will be so anemic that 2009 building starts will total about 496,000 homes, the lowest since the end of World War II in 1945, according to the economists’ forecasts. Foreclosures on pay option adjustable-rate mortgages and a backlog of bank-owned properties will slow any revival and keep housing from playing its traditional role of boosting economic recovery.

Residential construction and home sales led the way out of the previous seven recessions, with housing starts improving an average seven months and resales gaining strength about four months before the economy picked up.

‘Green Shoots’

The world’s largest economy probably will grow 1.9 percent next year, according to the average estimate of 56 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. After each of the last seven contractions, it expanded more than 3 percent on average in the first year of recovery.

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher said earlier this month that the U.S. is on the verge of rebounding with “healthy signs -- the stirrings of what I call green shoots.” So did former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, who cited “seeds of a bottoming” in housing during a May 12 speech at a National Association of Realtors conference in Washington.

“If you are looking at prices relative to income and rents, you could argue that we are at the bottom, and I’m cautiously optimistic that we may be,” said Thomas Lawler, a former Fannie Mae economist in Leesburg, Virginia. “It’s possible, however, that we could have a second wave of foreclosures and the very small amount of support the economy might have gotten will turn into the reverse.”

Prices Fall

Data released today showed foreclosures are still weighing on the housing market. Home prices in 20 major metropolitan areas fell 18.7 percent in March from a year earlier as foreclosures rose, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller index. Economists forecast the index would drop 18.3 percent.

The recession started after U.S. banks and Wall Street firms securitized mortgage loans made to the riskiest borrowers to earn fees only to see homeowners default, prices fall and the value of the bonds dwindle.

Three of the biggest investment banks were brought down by home loan-related investments. The U.S. government committed $29 billion to engineer the takeover of Bear Stearns Cos. in March 2008 by New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. Six months later, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history after becoming the biggest underwriter of mortgage- backed securities as real estate prices peaked.

Subprime Losses

Bank of America Corp. of Charlotte, North Carolina, bought Merrill Lynch & Co. in January after Merrill recorded more than $50 billion in losses and write downs tied to subprime home loans.

Read entire article :


Freddie Mac announces multifamily funding program

By: AFX | 26 May 2009
NEW YORK, May 26 (Reuters) - Freddie Mac said on Tuesday it will expand its multifamily mortgage funding by $1 billion under a new debt issuance program to investors. The sale of 'K Certificates' is expected to settle in June and is backed by 62 newly originated multifamily mortgage loans. (Reporting by Caryn Trokie; Additional reporting by Patrick Rucker in Washington; Editing by James Dalgleish) Keywords: FREDDIEMAC MORTGAGES/ANNOUNCEMENT (caryn.trokie@thomsonreuters.com; Tel: +1 646-223-6318; Reuters Messaging: caryn.trokie.reuters.com@reuters.net) COPYRIGHT Copyright Thomson Reuters 2009. All rights reserved.

The copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters News Content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters.

Sunday, May 24, 2009

How to pick a Mortgage

Understanding mortgage graphs and interest only house loans is important when buying a house.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Is this a good time to buy a house

watch what others have to say about the subject

U.S. Cities With The Most Underwater Mortgages

The Most Underwater Mortgages

For individual homeowners, being “underwater” on a mortgage – when a home is worth less than outstanding debt, or has “negative equity” – is one of the worst positions to be in, short of foreclosure.

Zillow.com, a firm that compiles US real estate and mortgage information, has put together a list of the 163 largest metro areas that includes statistics on median home values, market changes and the proportion of homes with negative equity. Also included is data on short sales, which occur when real estate sells for less than the value of outstanding debt on the property.

Included in the data is the “Zillow Home Values Index,” which represents the median measure of home valuations. According to Zillow’s most recent report, the median US home price is $182,378, down 14.2% from a year earlier. Almost one in five - 21.9% - of US homes are underwater.

So, which metro areas have the highest proportion of homes underwater? Click ahead for the results.

By Paul Toscano
Posted 15 May 2009

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Housing Bubble Sparks Buyer's Advantage

Housing Bubble Sparks Buyer's Advantage

In the early 2000's acquiring a home was a simple as buying a pair of shoes. A less than perfect credit score with no money down and no closing costs was just enough to secure a loan for a brand new home with up-to-date amenities. At the time, it seemed like the newest trend in home buying was a success, however, fluctuating interest rates and a plummeting economy tanked the housing market faster than the speed of light.

As the saying goes, one man's junk is another man's treasure, and in the case of today's housing market, it's true. If you're looking to purchase your first home, or have the liquid cash to buy up a few foreclosed properties, it can all be done.

Because home values and interest rates have fallen to a record low and inventory has spiked to an all time high, the potential buyer has the advantage. In many cases, home owners are desperately needing to sell their properties knowing they can't compete with today's low values, and as result, buyers can name their price. The only disadvantage is the difficulties of securing a loan. If you have stellar credit, it is still problematic to get that loan without proof of savings, a steady job that you've maintained for at least 18 months, and a down payment of at least 3.5 percent for a Federal Housing Loan (F.H.A.) and 5 percent through a major bank. If you have switched jobs and/or ran into some financial troubles that have been reported to the credit bureaus, don't even try. Spare yourself the time and rejection to secure a job get your credit fixed. Don't worry about time running out, as the current market is predicted to last for at least another 6 years.

If you are a first-time homebuyer, you are in luck because there is an $8,000 tax credit that was extended in February 2009 to all those who qualify for a loan. Another perk is a very low, fixed interest rate in addition to the banks footing the expense of closing costs and accepting down payments as low as 3.5 percent.

Foreclosures are a tricky business because of the hit or miss element. While you might score and find a home for half or less than what's it worth, three possibilities exist. First, you could very well find yourself a foreclosed property for a good price that's been destroyed by the previous owners so badly that the cost to repair the damages trumps what it's worth. Second, you could find a diamond in the rough and acquire a foreclosure with ease, but risk the chance of seeing no return because surrounding property values have fallen too low. Third, if you're trying to flip the foreclosure, the resale of the home could take longer than you have saved to maintain it. The best thing to do is plan to rent out the property or occupy it until it appraises to the desired return and sell.

If you're in the market to buy a home, it can be easily be done at the right time. If possible, start saving a little bit at time and continue to fix or build your credit so you "look good on paper" within the next few years.

Source

Southern California Home Prices Fall on Foreclosures

By Daniel Taub

May 19 (Bloomberg) -- Southern California house and condominium prices fell 36 percent in April from a year earlier as foreclosures accounted for more than half of all sales, MDA DataQuick said.

The median price dropped to $247,000 from $385,000 a year earlier and is now 51 percent below the peak reached two years ago, the San Diego-based research company said today in a statement. Sales rose 31 percent last month from a year ago.

“Whatever price stability is out there is tenuous at best,” said Andrew LePage, an analyst with MDA DataQuick. “It’s going to come down to how much worse job losses and foreclosures are going to get for the balance of the year.”

Sales of foreclosed homes accounted for 54 percent of all transactions involving previously owned properties in April. That marks the seventh consecutive month such properties were more than half of resales, MDA DataQuick said. The median price was down 1.2 percent from March, the research company said.

A total of 20,514 new and existing homes sold last month in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties, up from 15,615 a year earlier, the company said.

Absentee buyers, including investors requesting that their property-tax bills be sent to a different address, bought almost 19 percent of Southern California homes purchased in April. That’s up from 17 percent a year ago and compares with a 15 percent monthly average since 2000, MDA DataQuick said.

Read entire article

Monday, May 18, 2009

Mortgage Bubble About to Burst?


Millions of Americans are heavily burdened with first and, in many cases, second mortgages. People reached for "the American dream" of owning their home-but often a home somewhat beyond the reach of their incomes. Additionally, they pulled needed cash out of home equity through refinancing. Who controls these loans? What do creditors receive in return for their money? Are we about to experience a financial restructuring on a world scale with shocking consequences for the United States?
by Melvin Rhodes

The Old Testament book of Deuteronomy warns Israel of the consequences of disobedience to God's laws. The Israelites were given a choice-they could obey God and be blessed or disobey God and suffer the inevitable consequences.

One of the blessings for obedience was that Israel would "lend to many nations, but...not borrow" (Deuteronomy 28:12). The reverse would happen if the Israelites disobeyed: "The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail" (verses 43-44).

America is clearly starting to reap the negative financial consequences of disobedience, as a recent article in The American Conservative shows. Written by San Francisco financial analyst Robertson Morrow, the article is titled, "Living With the Bubble" (Feb. 10, 2003).

"As a percentage of personal income, mortgage debt has risen from 51 percent 25 years ago to over 100 percent today," points out Mr. Morrow. "In the last 5 years, mortgage debt has risen by 60 percent, or $2.2 trillion, an amount roughly the same as the profits of every American corporation for the last five years and twice China's exports to the entire world."

In a society where debt has become a national way of life, does this really matter?

Mr. Morrow says it does. "One problem with borrowing all this money is that people might not be able to pay it back. Another is that, for the foreseeable future, Americans will be spending a large proportion of their income on debt service. This will constrain consumer spending-two thirds of the economy-which will retard economic growth for the remainder of the decade. Slow economic growth will inhibit income growth, preventing us from earning our way out of the hole into which we have dug ourselves."

Housing has been one of the few sectors of the U.S. economy that has been doing well.

Lower interest rates have encouraged new homebuyers, while at the same time those already owning their own homes have refinanced their mortgages, often enabling them to get further into debt with new purchases. This cannot go on, as Mr. Morrow shows.

Refinancing has its limits

"Moreover, at some point, we will exhaust the supply of money available using homes as collateral. In 2001 and 2002, Americans extracted $300 billion in cash from their existing homes through refinancing and home equity loans. This infusion of cash is what has fueled rising consumer spending in the face of recession.

"Why did a rational capitalist society choose to lend people too much money, and why did rational capitalist Americans choose to borrow more than was good for them?

"Three reasons: The first is that the federal government dominates mortgage borrowing. The second is that modern finance has made it easier to succumb to the human temptation to borrow now and worry later. The third is that foreigners have-perhaps naively-been willing to lend Americans whatever we wanted. In short, American capitalism has been corrupted by government subsidies, value-free modern finance, and globalization."

Ominously, Mr. Morrow adds: "As Americans have increased their debt to finance the greatest consumer spending spree in the history of the world, we have become one of the most indebted people on the planet. Near the center of this degeneration is the transformation of the home mortgage from a means of savings to a means of spending."

When the bubble bursts and house values fall, millions of Americans will be in deep trouble. Much of their debt will be owed to foreign nations, America's former debtors turned creditors.

"An indispensable aspect of the debt binge is the willingness of foreigners to lend us the money. Not only is 20 percent of mortgage debt sold to foreign banks and other foreign buyers outright, but modern finance has made all liquid instruments de facto fungible. Even when foreigners buy other American financial assets, they are propping up a market of which mortgages are a part. Take the foreign buyers out of the equation and the whole thing collapses, and plentiful, cheap mortgage debt is no longer available to Americans."

In other words, Americans have become dependent on the willingness of foreign banks to continue their lending to a people already awash with too much debt. Well, Mr. Morrow did say that they were "perhaps naively" continuing to lend.

"Without foreign buyers, the wave of cash-out refinancing and home equity loans would reverse, and we would return to the normal mode of gradually paying down mortgages."

The banker has become the borrower

There was a time when the United States loaned to other nations. During both world wars American banks loaned money to the British and others when they most needed it to continue their war effort. After 1945, the American Marshall Plan helped Europe to recover from the ravages of war. America continued to invest in and loan to other countries.

It was the Vietnam War that began the big debt problem. The unpopular Vietnam War was fought without any increase in taxation at the same time as expanding social programs were introduced by the federal government. The rising costs of both put pressure on the dollar and, by 1971, the United States had to forego the link between the dollar and gold. No longer could people around the world rely on America to back up the dollar with gold on demand at $35 an ounce. For the last 30 years the U.S. dollar has been unredeemable currency, relying solely on confidence to maintain its value, its real worth unsupported by the precious metal.

In recent years, America's foreign debt has increased rapidly, receiving very little attention at home. While concern is expressed about the federal budget deficit-the difference between the amount the federal government receives in taxation and the amount it spends-the growing trade deficit has hardly been noticed. Yet, December's trade deficit was over $40 billion, the highest on record and the biggest trade deficit of any nation in the history of the world.

Ideally, a nation will balance its total trade with other nations. That means it will sell to others goods to the same value as what it buys. Selling more equals a trade surplus, selling less is a trade deficit. As Americans overspend on foreign goods, the money used has to go somewhere. Some is used to buy up American companies or land while a great deal of the rest is simply loaned to Americans, ironically enabling them to refinance their mortgages, spend the money saved and get even deeper into debt.

As Mr. Morrow puts it: "The foreign-debt bubble, and therefore the mortgage bubble, is a necessary consequence of our trade deficits. When we run a trade deficit, foreigners are giving us their goods not in exchange for our goods but in exchange for something else of value. Subject to trivial quibbles, this can only be two things. The first is foreign investment: when we give them a factory in America or a claim on a factory in America. The second is debt."

Simply put: "One necessary consequence of the present trade mess is that America is inexorably becoming a nation of debtors and other nations-principally Japan and her Asian imitators-nations of creditors. What this really means is that an entire society (ours) has become biased in favor of consuming things, while others have become biased in favor of owning things."

This also means that other countries have the power to pull the plug on the U.S. economy. What would be the consequences of this?

Potential global financial restructuring

"The global money market is a fickle lover. Once money stops blowing into a debt bubble, the bubble bursts, and no financial intervention can restore it. Just ask the Malaysians, the Russians, the Argentineans, or the U.S. telecommunications industry."

Bringing it down to the consequences for American homeowners, Mr. Morrow states: "What does this mean for the individual homeowner? The imprudent will suffer. Debt will become harder to assume, housing costs will fall, and consumer spending will sag. Those who refinanced to extract cash, took out a second mortgage, bought more house than they could afford, or failed to save, risk deep financial pain when the housing bubble bursts. Homebuyers depend on their jobs to make their mortgage payments, and the economic contraction caused by a squeeze on consumer spending will put those jobs in jeopardy. Even the prudent will suffer due to the irresponsibility of others: one's financial mistakes are not solely one's own business.

"Risk to the global financial system is even greater. For the first time in financial history, a major debtor nation owes its debt in its own currency. This means that rather than exporting goods to buy foreign currency to repay that debt, we can just print the money. We inflate the dollar to pay off foreigners in money that is not worth very much. Creditors will oppose destroying the dollar, but they lack the political clout of millions of American debtors. This opens the possibility of major inflation or polarization of the American political system between those serving the interests of foreign creditors and those representing American mortgage-holders. Neither is an attractive possibility, for either means the U.S. economy should be prepared to take a bubble bath."

Mr. Morrow may be overly optimistic when he writes, "creditors will oppose destroying the dollar." Since World War II, the U.S. dollar has been the preferred currency of international trade and finance. However, the dollar's recent slide in value against other currencies reflects a lack of confidence in the U.S. currency, partly due to the trade deficit and war jitters. At the same time, the increased value of the euro, the one-year-old European currency, shows increased confidence in the new currency, increasingly in demand around the world.

The bursting of the American debt bubble will impact the major creditor nations adversely along with the United States itself. The creditor nations are "Japan and her Asian imitators." A major reversal in the American economy would naturally affect these other countries first and foremost.

All nations would be affected, but the nations of the European Union would be impacted least. The euro could easily take over from the dollar as the world's major trading currency. By default, Europe would become the only engine capable of pulling the world economy out of recession.
MORTGAGE REAL ESTATE BUBBLE BLOG